摘要：

习近平总书记在哲学社会科学工作座谈会上指出:“一个国家的发展水平，既取决于自然科学发展水平，也取决于哲学社会科学的发展水平。”2018年下半年以来，教育部发出大力建设新文科的倡议，并将新文科与新工科、新医科、新农科等摆到同等重要位置。以此为契机，各地高校掀起了一轮改革热潮。经过实践摸索，各地高校在新文科建设过程中已形成了一定的理论与实践成果，当然其中也遇到不少问题和挫折。为进一步把握新文科建设与发展的总体规律，凝聚共识，明确新文科建设未来可能的努力方向，2019 年 10 月，《探索与争鸣》编辑部与南方科技大学共同主办了“新文科之新与创新人才培养”学术论坛。

李凤亮教授指出，新文科与传统文科在范围、指向、模式等层面存在区别，新文科建设应该找准“新定位”，才能产生“新作为”、体现“新地位”，建设新文科应该坚持以人为本、突出跨界融合、强化实践导向、探索范式创新。陶东风教授指出，谈论新文科不能把这个概念过分工具化、技术化、应用化，新文科的使命在于回应新的历史条件下“人”这一观念的变化，新文科要重新对“人”作出理解，以满足科技不断创新的时代需求。陈跃红教授指出，智能化时代人文学科不能蹲守在“孤岛”上继续看热闹，而应该积极走进科技的疆场深处，明确当下人文学科的真实处境，把握新文科建设的历史机遇。葛红兵教授指出，新文科建设的要点在于以创意创新为本位。美国、英国、澳大利亚等地将创意创新战略作为人文学科的重要转型理念，已经取得了卓越的成果。当下我国正需要一场以文化创意创新为核心驱动的新文科建设运动。石云里教授指出，新文科是在传统人文学科和理工科交融和碰撞中产生的“第三种文化”，它并非要对传统学科进行取代，而是以此为契机推动传统文理科进一步交叉融合和协同发展。高建平教授指出，新时代科技的创新发展不断形塑着社会形态，改变着人们的生产生活方式，但科技也可能带来一定的威胁。科技时代人文学科的新使命在于引导人们正确理性地面对科技发展，培养和发展适合时代需求的人文学科。徐新建教授指出，传统文科在西方经历了“死”与“生”的历程，新文科之“新”体现在整体的知识生产及教育传承相联系的观念、形态等各个方面。吴岩教授指出，传统文科的内核在于“守城式”的文化传承与保护，而新文科如果想要在人工智能、环境变迁等新的领域有所创见，就必须打破传统“守城式”的理念，进行“攻城式”的理念改造，鼓励新领域的开拓和新知识的获取。

Abstract:

 General secretary Xi Jinping pointed out that the development of a country depends not only on the natural science, but also on the philosophy and social sciences. Since the late 2018, the Ministry of Education has launched the initiative of building a new liberal arts department, and put the new liberal arts in the same important position as new engineering, new medicine, new agriculture, etc. Taking this opportunity, colleges and universities set o? a round of reform upsurge. 　　

Professor Li Fengliang pointed out that the construction of “new liberal arts” should ?nd out “new orientation”, so as to produce “new action” and re?ect “new status”. Professor Tao Dongfeng pointed out that the mission of the new liberal arts is to respond to the change of the concept of “human” under the new historical conditions. The new liberal arts should make a new understanding of “human” to meet the needs of the continuous creation of science and technology in the current era. Professor Chen Yuehong pointed out that in the era of intelligence, the humanities should actively enter the deep ?eld of science and technology, clarify the real situation of the current humanities, and grasp the historical opportunity of the construction of new liberal arts. Professor Ge Hongbing pointed out that the key point of the construction of new liberal arts is to take creative innovation as the standard. At present, China is in need of a new liberal arts construction movement driven by cultural and creative innovation. Professor Shi Yunli pointed out that the new liberal arts are the “third culture” produced in the integration and collision of traditional humanities and science & engineering, which will promote the further cross integration and coordinated development of traditional liberal arts and science. Professor Gao Jianping pointed out that the new mission of humanities in the era of science and technology is to guide people to face the development of science and technology correctly and rationally, and to cultivate and develop humanities that meet the needs of the times. Professor Xu Xinjian pointed out that the traditional liberal arts has gone through the process of “death” and “life” in the west, and the “new” of the new liberal arts is reflected in the aspects of knowledge production and education inheritance. Professor Wu Yan pointed out that the new liberal arts must break the traditional “city guarding” concept, carry out the “city attacking” concept transformation, and encourage the development of new ?elds and the acquisition of new knowledge