摘要： 从纯粹学术的角度看，在中国社会学已经发展到今天的情形下，“社会学中国化”乃是一个毋须讨论的不成问题的问题。有两个非纯粹学术性的因素推动了“社会学中国化”讨论：一是政治性的，与这门学科在中国的地位声望或者说合法性有关；二是学术政治的，与中国学者对中国社会学和中国社会学者在现代世界社会学学术共同体中的身份焦虑有关。社会学不仅是西方社会的产物，更主要是现代社会的产物，由此，在社会学中国化讨论中一些被作为不言而喻的前提的认识是值得重新思考的。有两种学术的主体性：一是张之洞式的“中体西用”的主体性；二是马克思式的将自己置身于现代世界的发展潮流，并立足于“人类社会”来检视中国社会的主体性，后者才是我们今天应该追求确立的。如果说“从中国看世界”是中国学术现代化的起步，那么，“从人类看中国”则是中国现代学术走向成熟的开始。

关键词: 社会学中国化, 政治, 学术政治, 现代性, 主体性

Abstract: From a purely academic perspective, the “sinicization of sociology” is an unproblematic issue that does not need to be discussed in the context that sociology has developed to the present extent in China. There are two non-academic factors contributing to the discussion of the “sinicization of sociology”: one is political, which has much to do with the legitimacy of the discipline in China; the other is academic politics, which related to the anxiety of Chinese scholars about the identity of Chinese sociology and Chinese sociologists in the academic community of modern world sociology. Sociology is not only the product of western society, but also the product of modern society. Therefore, some understandings in the discussion of “sinicization of sociology” are worth rethinking. There are two types of academic subjectivity that need to be clari?ed: one is represented by Zhang Zhidong’ s “Chinese learning for the foundation, western learning for practical use”; the other is the subjectivity of “Marxist” approach that place oneself in the development trend of the modern world and examine the Chinese society based on the “human society”. In fact, the latter is what we should pursue and establish today. If “observing the world from China” is the beginning of China’s academic modernization, then “observing China from mankind” is the beginning of China’s modern academic maturity.

Key words: sinicization of sociology, politics, academic politics, modernity, subjectivity