摘要： 谢宇教授认为，“社会学本土化是个伪问题”。然而，依据其划分的议题本土化、应用本土化、范式本土化来分析，无论哪个层面的本土化，都是当前中国社会科学研究面临的重要挑战，而不是伪问题。本土化讨论的核心在于社会科学的主体性。究竟是建立依附于美国的社会科学还是建立有主体性的中国社会科学，是当前中国社会科学研究必须回答的紧迫问题。中国社会科学的规范化建设应当服务于主体性建设，中国社会科学应以理解中国经验与实践为目标，基于中国经验与实践，借鉴古今中外一切理论与方法，再回到中国经验与实践中去检验。站在中国立场上建立有主体性的中国社会科学，恰逢其时。

关键词: 本土化, 规范化, 主体性, 社会学, 社会科学

Abstract:  According to Professor Xie Yu, “localization of sociology is a pseudo problem”. However, according to the localization of issues, applications and paradigms, no matter what level of localization, it is an important challenge for social science research in China. The core of localization discussion lies in the subjectivity of social science. Whether to establish a U. S. social science or a Chinese social science with subjectivity is an urgent question. The standardization construction of China’s social sciences should serve the subjectivity construction. Chinese social sciences should take the understanding of China’ s experience and practice as the goal, based on China’s experience and practice, draw lessons from all theories and methods at home and abroad, and then return to China’s experience and practice to test. It’ s just the right time to establish a subjective social science in China.

Key words: localization, standardization, subjectivity, sociology, social science