摘要：
尽管海德格尔、伽达默尔主张的前见依赖性解释学，是迄今仍被普遍服膺的解释学形态，但历史非连续性的一面，证伪了前见在解释中普遍有效在场命题，瓦解了前见依赖性解释学作为解释学唯一形态的可能性。而前见的意识本质及其先于和外在于被解释文本的特征，使得前见依赖性解释学对文本的解释，势必是不彻底的、外在的。前见依赖性解释学的这一缺陷，使得重建解释学及解释学由前见依赖性形态向非前见依赖性形态拓展在所难免。
关键词:
普遍有效性,
前见,
解释学,
非连续性,
重建
Abstract:
Although Heidegger’s and Gadamer’s hermeneutics is still widely accepted as an hermeneutic
form, the discontinuity of history falsifies the proposition that preconception is universally valid in
interpretation, and destroys the possibility that preconception dependent hermeneutics is the only form of hermeneutics. However, the conscious nature of foresight and its characteristics of being prior to and
outside the interpreted text make the interpretation of text by presupposition dependent hermeneutics
necessarily incomplete and external.
Key words:
universal validity
,
preconception
,
hermeneutics
,
discontinuity
,
reconstruction
肖士英. 构建中国阐释学（十一） | 解释学的重建：由前见依赖性形态向非前见依赖性形态拓展[J]. 探索与争鸣, 2020(11): 90-99.
Xiao Shiying.
The Reconstruction of Hermeneutics: From Preconceptive Dependence to Non-antecedent Dependence
[J]. Exploration and Free Views, 2020(11): 90-99.