摘要： 从两极共体的角度探析阐释的有限与无限，是符合阐释学的基本要义的。还可以进一步 强调，阐释的有限与无限不仅是两极共体式的“共在”，更多是两极共体的“冲突”， 冲突大于共在，有限与无限的冲突在根本上指向阐释的无限。阐释的无限性不是说阐释的问题没有客观标准，或让阐释走向过度和过界，而是指阐释的循环导致阐释无限接近 真理的特征。阐释的有限与无限，揭示了阐释活动中冲突与共在的特性，也指向了阐释学中过度阐释的解决限度问题，即“共在”是冲突和无限中的“共在”， 过度阐释只能在阐释的有限和无限的张力中寻求解决。 

关键词: 公共阐释, 冲突, 共在, 中国阐释学, 限度

Abstract: From the perspective of bipolar community, it is consistent with the basic meaning of hermeneutics to analyze the limitation and in?nity of interpretation. The ?niteness and in?nity of hermeneutics are not only the “co-existence” of the bipolar community, but also the “con?ict” of the bipolar community. The con?ict between ?niteness and in?nity is more than the “co-existence”, which fundamentally points to the in?nity of interpretation. The in?nity of hermeneutics refers to the feature that the circulation of hermeneutics leads hermeneutics to approach truth in?nitely. The ?niteness and in?nity of hermeneutics reveal the characteristics of conflict and co-existence in hermeneutic activities, and also point to the problem of solving limitation of excessive hermeneutics, that is, “co-existence” is “co-existence” in conflict and infinity, and excessive hermeneutics can only seek solutions in the ?niteness and in?nity of hermeneutics.

Key words: public reason, con?ict, co-existence, Chinese hermeneutics, limit