摘要： 全球正义是一个内涵丰富的概念，我们迫切需要一个理论框架，融贯而统一地涵盖规范性基础和各种经验维度，以指导全球正义经验研究中亟待解决的全球性问题。全球正义的理论框架整合了三种主要理论路径，即权利路径、公共益品路径与德性路径；其中，“德性路径”吸取了中国哲学思想资源，对传统西方视角下的正义观构成了重要补充，从而为全球正义经验研究和正义指数提供了更加完善的理论框架。“共同但有区别的责任原则”（CBDR-RC）和“世界主义但勤勉义务原则”（CDDR），可以用于确定和证成对于全球正义指标的选择。这两个原则，从议题性质这一全新角度考察全球正义概念，将九个议题划分为两大类别，从而更加严谨地衔接了理论与实践、规范性基础与实证研究，为概念化到量化操作的过程提供了更加可靠的衔接和过渡。全球正义概念指标操作化、议题领域选择、测量维度等问题，应该遵循上述三种理论进路和两个评估原则。

关键词: 全球正义, 理论, 概念, 原则, 指标, 方法论

Abstract: Global justice is a concept with rich connotations. We urgently need a theoretical framework to cover normative basis and various experience dimensions in a coherent and uni?ed way, so as to guide the global problems in the empirical study of global justice. The theoretical framework of global justice integrates three main theoretical paths, namely, the path of rights, the path of public goods and the path of virtue. Among them, the path of virtue draws on the resources of Chinese philosophy and constitutes an important supplement to the traditional Western perspective of justice, thus providing a more perfect theoretical framework for the study of global justice experience and justice index. The principle of common but differentiated responsibility (CBDR-RC) and the principle of cosmopolitan but diligent obligation (CDDR) can be used to determine and prove the choice of global justice indicators. 

Key words: global justice, theory, concept, principle, index, methodology