摘要：

本刊于 2020 年第 1 期刊发了南帆教授的文章《抽离了社会历史范畴的 π 还有效吗——与张江教授对话》以及周宪教授的文章《作为阐释学根据的公共理性》，两文分别围绕阐释的有限与无限、公共理性等话题展开论述。本刊 2020 年第 3 期刊发了曾军教授的文章《总体阐释的量化分析是否可能——与南帆教授商榷》，对南帆文进行了延伸讨论，提出建立有关文学意义阐释的总体性观念并引入量化分析作为手段，而傅其林教授则在《究竟什么是公共阐释——与周宪教授商榷》一文中，对公共理性提出质疑，并试图厘清究竟什么是公共阐释。此次刊出南帆教授与周宪教授的回应笔谈，供学界进一步讨论。在回应中，南帆教授对数学语言介入阐释学研究的意义提出了不同见解，而周宪教授则强调了公共理性是有效阐释的根本规范与原则。

——编者按

Abstract:  In the ?rst issue of 2020,professor Nanfan and professor Zhou Xian’s articles were published in the Exploration & Free Views. The articles focused on the limited and unlimited interpretation, public rationality and other topics. In the third issue, Professor Zeng Jun’s article was published, which extended the discussion of Nanfan’s article, proposed to establish the overall concept of literary meaning interpretation and introduce quantitative analysis as a means, while professor Fu Qilin’ s article questioned the public rationality, and tried to clarify what is the public interpretation. This time, the response written talks between professor Nanfan and professor Zhou Xian are published for further discussion. In response, professor Nanfan put forward different opinions on the signi?cance of mathematical language intervention in hermeneutic research, while professor Zhou Xian emphasized that public reason is the fundamental norm and principle of effective interpretation.