摘要： 文学阐释必须从作品出发，让阐释主体与作品之间构成一种平等的对话关系，才能获得理性意义上的说服力。在20世纪90年代“个人化写作”思潮研究中，有些论文要么在参照目标的选择上不够严谨，要么在作品择取上缺乏整体意识或以偏概全，导致阐释的有效性值得怀疑。文学阐释的多样性与作品的开放性之间，永远存在着微妙的博弈。作品的开放性并不意味阐释的无限性。阐释的边界既包括作品本身，也包括附着于作品内外且影响作品内涵的诸多元素。

关键词: 阐释, 有效性, 边界, 个人化写作, 参照目标

Abstract:  Literary hermeneutics must start from the works and make the hermeneutics subject and the works form an equal dialogue relationship in order to obtain rational persuasion. In the study of “personal writing” in the 1990s, some papers are either not rigorous in the choice of reference target, or lack of overall consciousness in the selection of works, or generalize in a partial way, which leads to the doubts about the effectiveness of hermeneutics. There is always a delicate game between the diversity of literary hermeneutics and the openness of works. The openness of works does not mean the in?nity of hermeneutics. The boundary of hermeneutics includes not only the work itself, but also many elements attached to the work and in?uencing the connotation of the work.

Key words: hermeneutics, validity, boundary, personal writing, reference target