摘要：
理论在发生时呈现为事件，但其后的发展逐渐失去对这一本性的敏感。因为理论基于语言论的进展而致力于祛魅，却与自身得以存在的基本估计形成悖论，为掩饰这一悖论的起点而反复操演，其吸附性印证了晚近后学所揭示的在场幻觉。这并非以观察沉思即事件的发生为词源的理论之本性。这种本性使理论每每自然地暗合于文艺实践，即不是意图去解释现实而生产意义，并相应地固化符号区分关系，而是出于理解未来的陌生感，与文艺实践一样在语言中创造意义并不断打破符号区分关系，成为晚近后学所同样揭示的差异性重复事件而积极兼容政治。这由此指向汉语书写对后理论的可持续支撑前景，提供了后理论中国化进程中的学理选项。
关键词:
理论 ,
事件 ,
吸附 ,
暗合 ,
话语创造
Abstract:
Theories appear as events when they occur, but gradually lose their sensitivity to this nature in subsequent
development. Because the theory is devoted to disenchantment based on the progress of the theory of language, it
forms a paradox with the estimation of its own existence, which is repeated in order to cover up the starting point of
this paradox, and its absorption confirms the illusion of presence revealed by the later studies. This is not the eventful
nature of a theory whose etymology is based on observation and contemplation, which often naturally alludes to
literary practice. Therefore, it points to the prospect of sustainable support for the post-theory of Chinese writing and provides theoretical option in the process of the post-theory sinicization.
Key words:
theory
,
event
,
adsorption
,
tacit conformity
,
creation of discourse
刘阳.
[J]. 探索与争鸣, 2021(1): 168-176.
Liu Yang.
Three Types of “Theory-Event” Relationship and the Research and Judgment of Post-Theory in China
[J]. Exploration and Free Views, 2021(1): 168-176.