摘要：
由于自身外延和内涵模糊不清，治理理论始终难以捕获一个稳定的内核，反而深陷不同流派共同塑造所形成的漩涡之中。持续的混乱使学者们在讨论治理时，指涉的其实是不同的概念。“治道”视阈下的治理追求良善的秩序，而“治术”话语体系中的治理则强调技治主义和对组织的控制。治理理论中“术”与“道”的分离导致了“视差”的出现，进而使治理逐渐扭曲成为一种“莫比乌斯环”状的矛盾理论。对于中国而言，不加拣选地按照这种矛盾的理论改造自身是鲁莽而危险的行为，中国国家治理体系和治理能力的现代化不是简单的西化，而是一个以完成治理理论本土化改造为前提的“术道合一”的过程。治理理论的中国化需要实现“术”与“道”的有机融合，这就要求中国的学者必须离开借鉴美国经验的老路，从更广阔的知识域中拣选能够改造治理理论的中国哲学与中国经验，帮助这一理论真正发挥治国理政的功能。
关键词:
">
治理理论｜视差｜术道分离｜术道合一｜本土化
Abstract:
Governance theory has always struggled to capture a stable kernel because of the ambiguity of its own extensions and connotations. Instead, it is trapped in a vortex of confusion shaped by multiacademic schools. The continuing confusion has caused scholars refer to different concepts when discussing the“governance”: Governance under the perspective of Politics is virtually a kind of“governance” in pursuit of good order, while governance in the discourse of Administration means a kind of“technology of governance” that emphasizes technocracy. The separation of the Technology and Tao generated parallaxes, which gradually distorted governance into a contradictory theory, like“The Moebius Strip”.
Key words:
">
governance theory｜parallax｜separation of technocracy and Tao｜unification of technocracy and Tao｜localization pathway
柳亦博.
治理理论的“视差”：术道分离与术道合一
[J]. 探索与争鸣, 2021(11): 167-176.
Liu Yibo.
The Parallax of Governance Theory: The Separation and Unification of Technocracy and Tao[J]. Exploration and Free Views, 2021(11): 167-176.