摘要：
不可否认，在目前的法学研究和法律适用中，的确存在看重实质逻辑的现象，而且通常都会把它放在形式逻辑的对立面，这难免会对法治建设产生不利后果。关键问题在于，单方面强调形式逻辑，通过重新定义法律概念的方式，矫正以往“带伤的思维”，并不一定可以促进法治建设的完善。其中，形式逻辑与实质逻辑其实未必矛盾，而且实质逻辑对法律外部价值的引入，已经通过基本的形式逻辑对逻辑的适用对象进行了一次逻辑适用。我国法律概念主要来自对西方概念的移植，此种事实决定了我国法律体系在未来仍需保持开放状态，以便对法律概念进行建构和修正。唯有如此，才可以夯实现代法律在中国社会生长的根基，加速法律体系的独立与完善。
Abstract:
It can not be denied that in the current legal research and legal application, there is a phenomenon
of valuing substantive logic, and it is usually placed in the opposite of formal logic, which will inevitably
have adverse consequences for the construction of the rule of law. The key problem is that unilateral emphasis
on formal logic and correction of the past“wounded thinking”by redefining the concept of law do not
necessarily promote the improvement of the construction of the rule of law. We also need to pay attention to the contradiction between formal logic and substantive logic.
陈雷.
[J]. 探索与争鸣, 2021(4): 95-100.
Chen Lei.
Substantive Logic and Illegal Treatment of “Injury”——Deliberate with Professor Chen Jinzhao
[J]. Exploration and Free Views, 2021(4): 95-100.