摘要：
近30年的人文学术生产在价值理性、传播方式、研究范式、计量化评价、问题导向以及学术资源配置等方面都产生了新的变迁，并引致人文学术不同走向。通过“内化”与“外溢”两种机制，20世纪90年代以来的人文学术为当代社会转型提供了充分的精神保障和思想启蒙。未来人文学术的良性发展应厘清三个问题——“数字人文”不等于“数字化的人文”，“学术分工”不等于“学科分野”，“实证研究”不等于“科学主义”；处理好三对关系——本土化与国际化、学术性与政治性、传承性与创新性；并紧紧把握人文学术生产的对策化、跨界化、技术化、国际化趋势。
Abstract:
In the past 30 years, humanities academic productivity has undergone new changes in value rationality, communication methods, research paradigms, etc., leading to difffferent trends in humanities and academics. Through the two mechanisms of “internalization” and “spillover”, the humanities has provided suffiffifficient spiritual guarantee and ideological enlightenment since 1990s. Three issues among them should be clarifified: “digital humanities” is not equal to “digitized humanities”; “academic division of labor” is not equal to “disciplinarity”; and “empirical research” is not equal to “scientism”. The relationship should be grasped between localization and internationalization, academic and political, inheritance and innovation.
Key words:
font-family:Calibri,
font-size:10.5pt,
">
color:#231F20,
font-size:9.5pt,
">market economy｜spiritual production｜humanities｜mode of production｜internalization｜spillover
李凤亮, 陈能军. 改革年代｜内化与外溢——社会转型背景下的人文学术生产[J]. 探索与争鸣, 2021(6): 169-179.
Li Fengliang & Chen Nengjun.
Internalization and Spillover ——Humanities Productivity under the Background of Social Transformation[J]. Exploration and Free Views, 2021(6): 169-179.