摘要:
20世纪20至30年代发生的中国社会性质问题大论战,在马克思主义中国化的进程中具有话语之源与理论准备的意义。论战推动马克思主义理论全面进入中国知识领域,促进了马克思主义中国化和中国共产党的理论成熟。它为中国新民主主义革命提供了理论基础,同时还为以马克思主义为指导的当代中国人文学科塑造了基本话语方式与理论架构,从而在质的规定性上塑造了当代中国学术的基本形态与范式。新时代加快构建中国特色哲学社会科学,依然要坚守已经被实践验证过的从社会性质出发的根本方法。
Abstract:
The great debate on the nature of Chinese society that occurred in the 1920s to 1930s is of great signifificance of the discourse source and theoretical preparation, which promoted the sinicization of Marxism and theoretical maturity of the CPC. It provided the theoretical basis for the new democratic revolution, offffered the basic discourse methods and theoretical framework for contemporary humanities, thus shaped the theoretical framework of Chinese academics and paradigms. In the new era, to accelerate the construction of philosophy and social sciences with Chinese characteristics, it is necessary to stick to the fundamental method that has been proven in practice.
Key words:
font-family:Calibri,
font-size:10.5pt,
">
color:#231F20,
font-size:9.5pt,
">debate on the nature of Chinese society|sinicization of Marxism|Chinese revolution|philosophy and social sciences with Chinese characteristics
李红岩. 革命年代|马克思主义中国化的理论溯源:重思中国社会性质问题大论战[J]. 探索与争鸣, 2021(6): 47-59.
Li Hongyan.
The Theoretical Sources of the Sinicization of Marxism: Rethinking the Debate on the Nature of Chinese Society[J]. Exploration and Free Views, 2021(6): 47-59.