摘要：
欧美后现代社会“慢速审美”，源于意大利的“慢食运动”，与其说是一种时间诗学， 不如说是一种“微观政治”。就知识生产而言，慢速审美需要的不是技术而是“思维术”。杨向荣等学者集中对“加速”进行文学或哲学的批判，认为慢速审美是现代救赎之路，但值得商榷的地方在于：一方面，审美与生产方式相比，只具有相对意义；另一方面，其论述“慢记忆”的逻辑起点和对“新异化”的借用也不甚贴合中国语境。 当下，特征性指标的选择是加深“加速”研究亟待解决的问题。就学术与政治而言，慢速审美都进行在坦途上，但“向后看”、二元对立、学者与大众之间不同的 TCP/IP 协议模式等可能导致慢速审美走入歧途。保持包容和等待可能是实现慢速审美现代性，即从“诗意的栖居”走向“诗意生存”的务实之路。
关键词:
诗意生存,
坦途,
歧途,
慢速审美
Abstract:
“Slow Speed Aesthetics” (SSA for short) in the West, originated from Italian “Slow Food Movement”, is more of micro politics than time poetics, which aims to a culture different from American style “counterculture”. In terms of knowledge production”, SSA is not a technology but a thinking art. Professor Yang and others focus on literary and philosophical criticism and think that SSA is a sure way out for modern people. On one hand, compared with production mode, SSA is relatively meaningful. On the other hand, there exists room for more discussion as far as the logical start of “Slow Memory” and borrowing of “New Dissimilation”. The urgent question for the present day is how to filter out characteristic indicators for “Speed Up” research.
Key words:
poetic survival,
level road,
wrong road,
Slow Speed Aesthetics
张谡.
慢速审美：诗意生存的坦途与歧途——兼与杨向荣教授商榷
[J]. 探索与争鸣, 2022(12): 101-106.
Zhang Su.
Slow Speed Aesthetics : Level and Wrong Roads for Poetic Survivals
[J]. Exploration and Free Views, 2022(12): 101-106.