摘要:
基于解决平台封禁问题的现实考虑,我国监管机构对互联网平台提出了互联互通的要求。在《反垄断法》中,互联互通体现为平台互操作性,它是解决封禁问题的基本路径,也有助于降低数字经济中网络效应可能造成的市场进入壁垒,促进平台领域的竞争。在传统反垄断制度中,拒绝互联互通可能构成滥用市场支配地位中的拒绝交易行为。不过,拒绝交易的认定以双方存在交易关系为前提,且受到反垄断法一系列严格条件的约束。基于此,欧美国家和地区尝试引入一种新型的事前监管工具,即另行颁布新法,将互联互通确立为大型互联网平台的法定义务。事前监管工具的好处是确定性强,避免了传统反垄断法分析方法不适应平台经济的发展,也能与事后处罚相结合,形成对数字平台的全链条监管。事前监管工具需要反垄断执法机构与行业监管部门的共同推进,并在监管部门主导下通过相应的技术与程序设计确保互联互通义务的真正实现。
关键词:
平台封禁,
互联互通,
拒绝交易,
事前监管工具,
守门人
In order to solve the blocking behaviors implemented by internet platforms, China’s regulatory
agencies put forward the requirements of“interconnection”. In the anti-monopoly law, the interconnection
is reflected in the interoperability obligation of the platform, which is the basic path to solve the problem of
blocking behaviors, and also helps to reduce the barriers to entry that network effects can create, so it will
enhance the market competition in the digital economy. In the traditional anti-monopoly law system, the reject
of interconnection may belong to a refusal-to-deal which in turn constitutes the abuse of market dominance.
However, the interconnection of refusal-to-deal is premised on the relationship between the two sides, and is
subject to a series of strict conditions in the anti-monopoly law. Based on this, the EU and the United States
have also tried to introduce a new type of prior regulatory tool, that is, enacting new laws, and establishing
interconnection as a statutory obligation of large internet platforms. The pre-prior regulatory tool has strong
determinism, avoiding many difficulties of the application traditional antitrust law in digital economy, and
also combines a full-term supervision of internet platforms with afterward punishment. The implementation
of the pre-regulatory tools requires cooperation between anti-monopoly agencies and regulators, and it is also
necessary to design the reasonable technical and procedures to ensure that the large platforms are truly fulfilled their obligations of interconnection under supervision.