摘要：
当前，中国多民族统一国家的历史叙事面临着话语更新的需求。国外学者从内亚史观、东北亚海域史观、民族交际空间史观出发的东北史叙事，对中国的统一多民族国家论构成了挑战。事实上，传统中国的区域历史发展是普遍政治秩序与地方因素互相作用的结果。战国、秦汉、魏晋的郡县体制塑造了东北的政治地理格局，为新兴政权提供了制度样板，同时为处于前国家阶段的诸族群提供了建立政权的文化资源与政治思想。隋唐以后，东北区域的体制化出现了类郡县化（明代都司、卫所）、属国化（渤海）、敌国化（高句丽）、王朝化（辽、金、清）等多元路径，但这些路径只是在普遍政治秩序中寻求位置变化，而不改变秩序模式本身。东北与西北、中原等各个地域之间具有联动关系，影响到中国历史运动的整体进程。因而，从区域发展的角度阐释传统中国的普遍政治秩序及其作用机制，是重构多民族统一国家历史叙事的一条可能途径。
关键词:
传统中国,
普遍政治秩序,
东北史,
历史叙事
Abstract:
The historical narrative of China’s multi-ethnic unified country is facing the need of discourse
renewal. The Northeast narrative of foreign scholars, starting from the historical view of Inner Asia, the
historical view of Northeast Asian sea area and the historical view of national communication space, has
posed a challenge to the theory of a multi-ethnic unified state. In fact, the regional historical development
of traditional China was the result of the interaction between the general political order and local factors.
However, these paths only sought to change the position in the general political order, not the order model
itself. And there was a linkage relationship between the Northeast, Northwest, mainland and other regions.
Therefore, the interpretation of the universal political order and its function mechanism in the region is a possible way to reconstruct the historical narrative of a multi-ethnic unified country.
Key words:
traditional China,
universal political order,
history of Northeast China,
historical narrative