Professor Zhang Jiang elaborates, the orientation regarding the development of Chinese hermeneutics on six aspects, in“The Major Problems in the Construction of Chinese Hermeneutics”, all of which are instructive. However, it is difficult to avoid following the Western paradigm, logic and theoretical framework when discussing interdisciplinary issues within the framework of“disciplinary thinking”of modern hermeneutics. The development direction of hermeneutics in China will unconsciously turn to“inject modern disciplinary elements into Chinese hermeneutic practice”and finally turn to“the Chinese development of Western hermeneutics”. The construction of“Chinese hermeneutics”should aim at the construction and establishment of“Chinese character”, point out the national characteristics and declare the national identity. As the“subject of interpretation”, China is independent of the Western interpretation theory with the“non discipline”and“fuzziness”of the traditional interpretation practice. China is the“interpreted object”. It can confirm the concept of“China”to the Sinology field, use its own identity to reach an“identity consensus” with the west, so as to build the basis for theoretical communication and make the Chinese interpretation theory enter the modern interpretation theory system.

"> Chinese hermeneutics, interdisciplinary, collectiveness, ambiguity, Sinology