摘要：
非同质化通证可与链外特定数字艺术品形成一一对应的映射关系，为之提供权利凭证。非同质化通证的价值来源包括所映射的特定数字资产，也包括自身独立价值，应作为网络虚拟财产纳入物权保护范围。实践中非同质化通证面临“铸造权”缺乏制约、去中心化存储的悖论及碎片化等法治困境。作为应对方案，机构上线非同质化通证前应承担审查其来源合法性的义务，发生侵权纠纷后可采用“基于区块链的纠纷解决机制”；中心化存储可以向多中心存储机制转换，对境外公有链采取完全去中心化的存储机制，事先引入区块链安全公司审计，设置黑名单制度及全网信息通报机制；监管机构打击本领域“标准化合约交易”、非法资产证券化等违规行为。
关键词:
非同质化通证,
权利凭证,
数字艺术品,
权利困境,
区块链
Abstract:
The non-fungible token can form a one-to-one mapping relationship with specific digital artworks
outside the chain to provide the certificate of authority. The value source of the non-fungible token includes the
mapped specific digital assets, as well as its own independent value, which should be included in the scope of
property protection as a network virtual property. In practice, the non-fungible token is faced with many legal
difficulties. As a response plan, the institution shall undertake the obligation to review the legitimacy of its source before launching the non-fungible token.
Key words:
non-fungible token,
certificate of authority,
digital artwork,
right dilemma,
blockchain