摘要：

从环境社会学的视角看，日本核污水排海本质上是一个生态系统（海洋生态风险）与社会系统（全球危机管控）之间互生的环境问题，其本身彰显了全球环境安全失控的可能性，即这一“不应该”发生的行动最终反而得以实施。注重于行动实现的可能性及其后果的风险性分析的既有研究路径难以解释这一现象。通过环境问题的系统转化传导过程可以发现，日本利用制度博弈、技术理性和感知建构及其相应的策略集合，为其排海行动建构了法理、程序和意识形态的“合法性”。而从治理的角度看，日本核污水排海的“合法性”建构机制内嵌的三种“合法性”危机——规则缝隙、信任危机和认知操纵，又是导致当前全球环境治理的“治危孪生”这一内在矛盾的主要因素。

关键词:

制度博弈, 技术理性, 感知建构, 核污水, 治危孪生

Abstract:

From the perspective of environmental sociology, Japan’s discharge of Fukushima Nuclear Contaminated Water is essentially an environmental problem between the eco-system (marine ecological risk) and the social system (global crisis management). The existing research paths that focus on the risk analysis of the possibility and consequences of releasing cannot explain this phenomenon.Through the systematic transmission process of environmental issues, it can be seen that Japan has successfully constructed the legal, procedural and ideological “legitimacy” for its discharge by using institutional game, technical rationality and perceptual construction. Meanwhile, the three kinds of legitimacy crises embedded in the construction mechanism of the “legitimacy” of discharging: rule gaps, trust crises, and cognitive manipulation are the main factors leading to the internal contradiction of the “governance-crisis twin” of the current global environment.

Key words:

institutional game, technical rationality, perceptual construction, Nuclear Contaminated Water, governance-crisis twin