探索与争鸣 ›› 2023, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (11): 87-96.

• 学术争鸣 • 上一篇    下一篇

数字化时代的“法律创生”

唐林垚
  

  • 出版日期:2023-11-20 发布日期:2023-11-20
  • 作者简介:唐林垚,中国社会科学院法学研究所副研究员。(北京 100009)

Law Autopoiesis in the Digital Era

Tang Linyao
  

  • Online:2023-11-20 Published:2023-11-20
  • Supported by:

    国家社会科学基金青年项目“数字化与‘法律创生’原理阐发和机制构建”(23CFX078)

摘要:

数字技术的高速发展,给传统的法律供给范式带来巨大挑战。为克服当前法律供给范式理念滞后、维度单一、视域狭隘等不足,应采取二阶趋势观察的方法,坚持面向未来的灵活时间观感,实现综合意义上的“向前检视”和“向后推演”,探寻“法律创生”的全新路径。构造上,“法律创生”应包含联结性、选择性和趋变性三项机制,并通过历史赓续、位阶层移、反窥区辨等举措,以提供高度概括但具备可操作性的秩序安排。同时,为将数字技术带来的风险置于法律可控范围内,需辅以法律解释、执行促进、便捷申诉等外部措施,并基于目的限缩、道德规训和政治约束,内建导向矫正程序。

关键词: 数字化, 法律创生, 规则供给, 二阶趋势, 规范适用

Abstract:

The rapid development of digital technology poses significant challenges to the traditional legal supply paradigm. This article introduces an autopoietic legislative path that features a second order trend observation method with flexible time perception. Structurally, law autopoiesis has three mechanisms including connectivity, selectivity and variability so as to provide a highly generalized but operable order arrangement through legislative techniques such as historical succession, positional hierarchy shift and retrospective discrimination. Meanwhile, in order to control the risk of over-digitalization, external measures such as legal interpretation, implementation promotion, and convenient appeals should be supplemented, and internal corrective procedures should be built based on purpose limitation, moral discipline and political constraints.

Key words: digitalization, law autopoiesis, rule supply, second order trend, norm application