摘要：
将见义勇为入法是《民法典》回应社会公众现实关切、彰显中华民族优秀传统文化核心价值与理念的重要举措。从具体的实践来看，“江歌案”等典型案例的裁判结果映射出当下司法实践中存在见义勇为的制度目标达成度不高的问题。同时，从研究现状来看，学界对见义勇为的认定亦存在较大分歧。从根源上来看，这是由于我国民法领域诸多概念和制度在进行本土化转换时并未考虑相应的历史基础。应该看到，《民法典》语境下的见义勇为与西方制度中的“好撒玛利亚人法”及“救助义务”等在内涵与外延上均存在本质差别。我国见义勇为的法律内涵要突出对“义”“勇”的强调，充分考虑这一概念的历史语境与当代文化语境，抽象提炼其细节性规则，完善对见义勇为者合法权益的保护机制，形成彰显中国特色的见义勇为的本土化规则体系。
关键词:
Abstract:
It is one of the important measures taken by the Civil Code to highlight core socialist values to join the law for brave action for righteousness. The judgment results of the “Jiang Ge Case” reflect the limited achievement of the institutional goal of brave action for righteousness in current judicial practice. There also exists substantial academic divergence in interpreting the principle. Fundamentally, this divergence stems from the fact that many concepts and institutions in our civil law have not taken into account the corresponding historical basis during the process of localization. It should be acknowledged that brave action for righteousness under the context of the Civil Code substantially differs from Western societies’ “Good Samaritan Laws” and “duty to rescue” in terms of connotation and extension. The legal connotation of brave action for righteousness in China should emphasize the elements of “virtue” and “courage”, taking into the historical and contemporary cultural contexts account. This requires abstracting and refining the detailed rules, enhancing the protection of the legitimate rights and interests of the brave action for righteousness and establishing a localized rule system that embodies Chinese characteristics.
Key words:
brave action for righteousness,
Civil Code,
ethical norms,
localization
沃耘.
“江歌案”中的法律与道德|加快见义勇为规则的本土化建构
[J]. 探索与争鸣, 2023(8): 73-82.
Wo Yun.
Accelerate the Localization Construction of the Rule of Brave Action for Righteousness
[J]. Exploration and Free Views, 2023(8): 73-82.