摘要:
思想史与文学史之间存在“关联性”。“思想史视野下的中国现当代文学研究”,不是研究作为思想史一部分的文学,不是把文学史作为思想史的分析材料,而是将“思想史”作为“文学史”的一种研究方法;不只是关注思想影响了文学,而是讨论思想如何影响了文学,文学又以怎样的方式传达和创造了思想。因此,这一研究凸显的是“思想”与“问题”的对话——视野是思想史的,问题则在文学史。思想史视野下的现当代文学研究,在清理和呈现“外在影响”的同时更侧重关注“思想”如何成为“文学”的“内在”构成,因而,也是把“外在影响”转换为“内部生成”的一种考察,由此或可打开进入文学史乃至人类精神史的另一条路径,重启历史与当下的对话。
关键词:
思想史,
文学史,
中国现当代文学,
跨学科
Abstract:
There is a “correlation” between the history of thoughts and the history of literature. The proposal of “the study of modern and contemporary Chinese literature in the perspective of history of thought” is not to study literature as part of the history of thought, or to use the history of literature as a material for analyzing the history of thought. Instead, it takes “history of thought” as a research method of “history of literature”. It not only focuses on the influence of thoughts on literature, but also discusses how thoughts influence literature, and in what way literature conveys and creates thoughts. Therefore, this research emphasizes the dialogue between “thoughts” and “problems”—the vision is the history of thought, while the problems are in the history of literature. The study focuses on how “thought” becomes the “inner” composition of “literature” while cleaning up and presenting the “external influence”, which is also a kind of examination to transform “external influence” into “internal generation”. It may open another path to the history of literature and even the history of human spirit, and restart the dialogue between history and the present.
Key words:
history of thought,
history of literature,
modern and contemporary Chinese literature,
interdisciplinarity
王尧.
·一百年与二十年:百年中国文学思想史(八)·|“思想”如何成为“文学”的内在构成——对百年文学思想史路径的思考[J]. 探索与争鸣, 2024(1): 53-60.
Wang Yao.
How “Thought” Becomes the Inner Composition of “Literature”: Reflections on the Path of Literary Thought History[J]. Exploration and Free Views, 2024(1): 53-60.