摘要：
中外关于“中国”的解读存在差异。当前国际社会格局的转变与当代中国的崛起，日益凸显出西方中国学既往研究范式在解读中国时的效用困境。世界中国学倡导深入践行“批评的中国学”研究，以区域研究为方法路径，通过“深读”的文本分析与“躬行”的经验研究与世界共议“何为中国”。世界中国学以文明比较的视野，关注中华文明和当代中国中“人”的丰富内涵，呈现出“以人为中心”的研究理念。在此范式转变的过程中，中国从西方理论的消费者逐步转变为全球范围内中国研究的主体与中国道理的讲述者，并在此过程中期冀形成本土立场与全球眼光兼具的中国知识，助益人类文明互鉴与发展。
关键词:
世界中国学,
世界之问,
批评的中国学,
以人为中心
Abstract:
There are always differences between Chinese and Western interpretations on “China”. World China Studies advocate the in-depth practice of “critical China studies”, taking regional studies as a methodological approach, and discuss “what is China” with the world through the text analysis of “deep reading” and the empirical research of “social investigations”. From the perspective of comparisons among civilizations, World China Studies pay attention to the rich connotation of “people” in Chinese civilization and contemporary China, and present the research concept of “human-centered”. In the process of this paradigm shift, China has gradually changed from a consumer of Western theories to a subject of Chinese studies and a narrator of Chinese truth on a global scale, hoping to form Chinese knowledge with a local perspective and a global perspective, which will contribute to the mutual learning among civilizations and development of all human beings.
Key words:
World China Studies,
questions of the world,
critical China studies,
human-centered approach
褚艳红.
我们需要什么样的“世界中国学”[J]. 探索与争鸣, 2024(3): 166-176.
Chu Yanhong.
What Kind of “World China Studies” We Need[J]. Exploration and Free Views, 2024(3): 166-176.