数字技术所驱动的基层平台治理，正逐渐成为我国社会治理体系和社会治理能力现代化的重要关节。基层社会的治理平台不仅是一种技术工具，更是一种思维方式，还是一种组织结构。根据目的和功能的分类标准，基层数字治理平台可划分为管理型平台、合作型平台和协助型平台三类。面对基层“事多人少”的资源困境和复杂多元的治理需求，数字技术赋能基层社会治理的运作逻辑体现为平台化逻辑、数字赋能逻辑，以及风险规避逻辑。然而，基层社会治理的数字化逻辑与法治化逻辑之间存在一定的张力，这表现为价值层面效率至上与公平公正间的张力、技术迭代与立法滞后的矛盾、技术赋能与科层体制的冲突。对此，基层社会治理的平台化需要对技术理性保持高度审慎，探索适当超前和多元的规范供给模式，以及明确平台的法律性质与运行机制。

基层治理, 平台化, 数字赋能, 法治张力

The governance of grass-roots platforms driven by digital technology is gradually becoming an important joint in the modernization of China’s social governance system and social governance capacity. The governance platform of grass-roots society is not only a technical tool, but also a way of thinking and an organizational structure. However, there is a certain tension between the logic of digitalization of grassroots social governance and the rule of law, which is manifested in the tension between the supremacy of efficiency and fairness/justice at the value level, the contradiction between the iterationof technology and the lagging of legislation, and the conflict between technological empowerment and hierarchical system. In this regard, the platform-based governance of grass-roots society needs to maintain a high degree of prudence with regard to technological rationality, explore an appropriately advanced and diversified mode of normative provision, and clarify the legal nature of the platform and its operational mechanism.

grassroots governance, platformisation, digital empowerment, rule of law tension