论述文学史上关于“传统”的争论具有思想史意义。文学传统是文化传统的组成部分，并且在民族国家话语中卷入争论。分析表明，一批概念与“传统”存在多维的互动关系，种种视野的交叉、平衡、呼应形成多重因素复杂交错的理论谱系。要摆脱“整体性”的否定与肯定的理论陷阱，必须分别考察文化逻辑、社会历史对于文化传统的双重作用，民族或阶级作为文化传统主体可能产生的分歧，以及文化传统之于自然科学与人文学科的不同意义。民族主体、文化传统、社会历史三者中，富于活力的民族主体当处于主动者的位置。

文化传统, 民族国家, 文化逻辑, 阶级, 自然科学, 人文学科

The debate over “tradition” in literary history has historical significance. Literary traditions are part of cultural traditions and have been involved in debates in the discourse of nation-states. The analysis shows that there is a multidimensional interaction between a group of concepts and “traditions”, and the intersection, balance and echo of various horizons form a complex and intertwined theoretical spectrum of various factors. In order to escape from the theoretical trap of denial and affirmation of “wholeness”, it is necessary to examine the dual roles of cultural logic and social history on cultural traditions, the possible divergence of ethnicity or class as the subject of cultural traditions, as well as the different significance of cultural traditions for the natural sciences and the humanities. Among the three elements of national subject, cultural tradition, and social history, the dynamic national subject should be in the active position.

cultural tradition, nation-state, cultural logic, class, natural sciences, humanities