不同于马克思在《资本论》第 1 卷中所谈到的工人因被束缚于机器生产而精疲力竭的状况，数字时代的倦怠突破了体力劳动的界限，并展现出精神内耗等诸多新特征。其生成机制可视作自我剥削、社会加速、过量的人机交互以及在数字技术支持下工作挤压生活等多重因素共同作用的结果。立足于马克思的资本批判理论可以发现，上述机制无不植根于数字时代资本积累的矛盾及内在要求，构成了数字时代倦怠背后的深层逻辑。韩炳哲对数字时代倦怠现象的分析无疑具有重要的理论价值，但由于其理论框架缺乏资本批判维度，最终仅停留于现象层面的考察和描绘。

自我剥削, 社会加速, 人机互动, 资本积累

Unlike the exhaustion of workers bound to machine production as discussed by Marx in the first volume of “Capital”, burnout in the digital age transcends the boundaries of physical labor and exhibits new characteristics such as mental exhaustion. In terms of its generative mechanism, burnout in the digital age can be seen as the product of multiple factors, including self-exploitation, social acceleration, excessive human-machine interaction, and the intrusion of work into life due to digital technology. Grounded in Marx’s critique of capital, it becomes evident that these generative mechanisms are deeply rooted in the contradictions and inherent demands of capital accumulation in the digital age, which constitute the deep logic behind digital-era burnout. Byung-Chul Han’s analysis of burnout in the digital age undoubtedly holds significant theoretical value. However, due to the lack of a capital critical dimension in his theoretical framework, it ultimately only stays at the level of examining and describing phenomena.

self-exploitation, social acceleration, human-machine interaction, capital accumulation