当时间和节奏越来越偏离人类社会轨道，节奏分析通过对“时间之问”的日常性转换，提供了社会时间抽象概念的具象理解。为填补空间转向思潮所遗漏的理论“盲域”，有必要重拾列斐伏尔的遗稿，接续列斐伏尔晚年转向的存在主义马克思主义路径，从时间意向性深描集体生活的社会节奏，将其划分为循环和线性两种类型。其中，循环和线性的“节奏失衡”直指日常生活异化的现代性议题，突出如经济生产的快节奏卷入日常生活并制造了加速、压缩的时间景观。对此，反节奏化的社会理想方案重新提出“等律节奏”的诗性救赎、“时空结合”的都市革命。围绕“多元节奏”“节奏失衡”“等律节奏”之脉络，得以推演“时间的生产”命题，完成空间生产理论的合奏以及日常生活批判的解题。

节奏, 时间的生产, 日常生活, 节奏失衡, 等律节奏

As time and rhythm increasingly diverge from the orbit of human society, this analysis provides a concrete understanding of the abstract concept of social time through the everyday transformation of the “question of time”. However, it gradually falls into a theoretical “blind spot” caused by the spatial turn. To address the temporal-spatial synthesis in everyday life, it is necessary to revisit Lefebvre’s unpublished manuscripts and continue the existential Marxist path he turned to in his later years. By deeply describing the social rhythm of collective life from the perspective of time intentionality, we divide it into two types: cyclical and linear. Among them, the “rhythm imbalance” between cyclical and linear rhythms directly points to the modernity issue of everyday life alienation, highlighting how the fast pace of economic production is integrated into everyday life and creates an accelerated, compressed landscape of time. In response, the ideal social solution against this trend re-proposes the poetic redemption of euthymia and the urban revolution that combines time and space. Focusing on “multiple rhythms”, “rhythm imbalance”, and “euthymia”, we can deduce the proposition of “the production of time”, completing the ensemble of spatial production theory and solving the puzzle of everyday life critique.

rhythm, production of time, everyday life, rhythm imbalance, euthymia